In air travel, there’s a big difference in how much tax people pay depending on whether they fly on private jets or commercial airlines. President of United States Joe Biden wants to change this by making it more expensive to fuel private jets.
His idea is to make things fairer because right now, private jets don’t pay as much in taxes as commercial flights do. He considers those who fly on private jets should contribute more to things like managing airspace and airport projects.
So, want to know more about this potential ‘cut’ in carbon emission? Check this one out.
The Big Differences
Right now, there’s a big difference in the amount of tax that people who fly on private jets pay compared to those who fly on regular commercial airlines.
Joe Biden proposed to change it by increasing the tax on fuel for private jets by a lot. The plan may rise the tax into about 400% of its original number.
It means that the people who own or use private jets would have to pay much more for the fuel they use.
The reason behind this proposal is that currently, people flying on commercial airlines pay special taxes on their tickets, which helps fund important things like managing the airspace and airport projects.
However, private jets don’t pay as much in taxes even though they also use these services. In fact, private jets only contribute less than 1% of the taxes that go into funding aviation and airports, even though they make up 7% of all flights.
The proposal aims to make things fairer by ensuring that those who use private jets contribute more towards the costs of air travel infrastructure and management. It would mean more money for things like hiring air traffic controllers and improving safety measures.
“I also want to end tax breaks for big pharma, big oil, private jets, massive executive pay,” Biden stated in front of Congress.
However, it’s not clear yet whether this proposal will be accepted by Congress, where some politicians may oppose it.
Jets and Emission
It turns out that these jets produce a lot more pollution compared to other forms of transportation, like commercial airplanes. In fact, for every passenger on board, private jets emit around 10 to 14 times more greenhouse gases.
It is a big concern because greenhouse gases contribute to climate change, which is causing problems like extreme weather and rising sea levels. To put it in perspective, an average trip on a private jet produces nearly six tonnes of CO2.
We can associate it like driving a car that uses petrol all the way from Paris to Rome 16 times. It is a lot of pollution, especially when you consider that there are many private jets flying around the world every day.
So, increasing the tax on fuel for private jets not only aims to make things fairer in terms of funding air travel infrastructure, but it also hopes to discourage the use of these jets because they’re so polluting.
By making it more expensive to fly on private jets, people might start considering more eco-friendly alternatives, like commercial airlines or even trains. The goal is to reduce the harmful emissions produced by private jets and promote more sustainable forms of transportation to help protect the environment.
Unfair for Jets Industry?
On one side, there are people who argue that increasing taxes on private jets is unfair because the business aviation industry is important for the economy. They say that private jets help companies succeed and create jobs, so making it more expensive to use them could hurt businesses and job opportunities.
For example, Ed Bolen the president of the National Business Aviation Association thinks that President Biden’s proposal is unfair.
“Business aviation is an industry that is essential to America’s economy and transportation system. It supports jobs, connects communities, helps companies succeed and provides humanitarian lift in times of crisis. It is an industry that should be promoted, not pilloried,” he said.
He believes that the business aviation industry plays a crucial role in America’s economy and transportation system. According to him, private jets connect communities, support jobs, and even provide help during emergencies.
However, on the other side, there are those who support the tax increase because they’re concerned about the environmental impact of private jets. They argue that even though private jets contribute to the economy, they also produce a lot of pollution. By making it more expensive to use private jets, they hope to encourage people to choose more environmentally friendly options for travel.
So, there’s a debate between those who prioritize economic benefits and those who prioritize environmental concerns when it comes to taxing private jets. Both sides have valid points, and it’s up to policymakers to find a balance between supporting the economy and protecting the environment.
Where Do The Tax Revenue Go?
Biden’s proposal aims to use the additional tax revenue from private jets to upgrade facilities and hire more air traffic controllers. It is important because many of the facilities used by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) are quite old – on average, they’re around 40 years old.
By investing in modernizing these facilities and hiring more staff, the government hopes to make air travel safer and more efficient. It may lead better management of air traffic, which could reduce the risk of accidents and delays.
Additionally, the proposal includes funding for projects like repairing roads and bridges, as well as improving railroad infrastructure. Overall, the goal is to use the increased tax revenue to invest in the infrastructure needed to support air travel and transportation more broadly.
This not only includes upgrades to facilities and hiring more staff but also funding projects to improve other forms of transportation like roads, bridges, and railways. By investing in these areas, the government aims to create a safer and more efficient transportation system for everyone.
So, will the betterment be approved? Or, even if the proposal is accepted it would not lead to significant betterment? Let’s wait and see.
Sources:
Leave a Reply